Add Trivial Contributions to Workstream Policy

As discussed in #63 (comment) onward.

Co-authored-by: Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>

Workstream Policy.md

@@ -103,6 +103,15 @@ The [Steering Group] approves new [Workstreams][Workstream] and determines the [
 [Contributions] are deemed to have been made jointly by both the individual submitting the
 [Contribution][Contributions] and any [Entity] identified in the [Contributor and Workstream Participant Agreement].
 
+##### Trivial contributions
+
+Trivial contributions may be accepted without coverage from the agreement. A trivial contribution is one that fits one of the following categories:
+
+* Makes no changes to the visible text content (for example, fixing broken links, style sheets, or markup).
+* Does not affect conformance (e.g., corrects a typographic error in a descriptive sentence), which should not change architectural or interoperability requirements for an implementation. Such changes should be small in scope (e.g., on the order of a few dozen characters changed at most); correcting non-normative code examples where the code clearly conflicts with normative requirements is fine, adding new non-normative code examples is not.
+
+If there is any doubt or disagreement as to whether requirements are changed, such contributions should not be considered trivial.
+
 #### Withdrawing contributions
 
 A [Contributor][contributor] may withdraw a [Contribution][Contributions] to a [Workstream] by notice to the [Steering Group]