Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Require [Exposed] even when marked as [LegacyNoInterfaceObject] #920

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2020

Conversation

saschanaz
Copy link
Member

Fixes #919

Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, reading #423 again I might have missed something. I think we allowed this for mixin scenarios (which we used to use LegacyNoInterfaceObject for), but I'm not sure if we still have those type of mixins left or if all the LegacyNoInterfaceObject usage are interfaces that ought to be exposed but aren't.

Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I have convinced myself that changing this is good as if there are any interfaces like that left they should be converted to mixins.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

What does [Exposed] mean on [LegacyNoInterfaceObject] interfaces?
3 participants