Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat add epaper 2in9 board #10

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bonnyr
Copy link
Contributor

@bonnyr bonnyr commented Mar 11, 2023

A new 2.9" ePaper board to go with the WS29v2 custom chip (alpha)

This is the same PR as #9 but since I cannot change the source branch in that PR and since the branch name had changed to reflect a more generic board name, this one was created.

@urish - in addition to the other discussion in #9 I would like to propose that the chip version mentioned as dependency and points to a particular release on GitHub be a separate field - version with a UI that allows the user to select from available versions since this board definition is likely to have a different lifecycle than the chip implementing the functionality.

This could be a feature you're already thinking about for wokwi/wokwi-features#302 so maybe this is not needed

@urish
Copy link
Contributor

urish commented Mar 12, 2023

@urish - in addition to the other discussion in #9 I would like to propose that the chip version mentioned as dependency and points to a particular release on GitHub be a separate field - version with a UI that allows the user to select from available versions since this board definition is likely to have a different lifecycle than the chip implementing the functionality.

Good point - haven't thought about this yet. Dependency management is hard. Boards add nested dependencies, which is where complexity even grows :)

@urish urish merged commit 637f17f into wokwi:master Mar 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants