Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Bazel cache trimming for rules_oci blobs. #1371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2023

Conversation

SanjayVas
Copy link
Member

@SanjayVas SanjayVas commented Dec 15, 2023

rules_oci outputs additional layer blobs that result in the Bazel cache being too large. See bazel-contrib/rules_oci#439

@wfa-reviewable
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@SanjayVas SanjayVas force-pushed the sanjayvas-rules_oci-cache branch 4 times, most recently from c4d5669 to cacf70a Compare December 15, 2023 21:55
@SanjayVas SanjayVas marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2023 22:48
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevenwarejones stevenwarejones left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @SanjayVas)

rules_oci outputs additional layer blobs that result in the Bazel cache being too large.
@SanjayVas SanjayVas enabled auto-merge (squash) December 16, 2023 02:10
@SanjayVas SanjayVas merged commit 2aebc7a into main Dec 16, 2023
5 checks passed
@SanjayVas SanjayVas deleted the sanjayvas-rules_oci-cache branch December 16, 2023 03:20
@SanjayVas SanjayVas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2024
42 tasks
ple13 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
rules_oci outputs additional layer blobs that result in the Bazel cache being too large. See bazel-contrib/rules_oci#439
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants