Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

dwc_eqos - queue tuning #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023
Merged

dwc_eqos - queue tuning #25

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023

Conversation

idigdoug
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Try to tune the flow control on the Rx queue. Seemed to have a minor throughput improvement from sending pause packet at about half full.
  • Make the flow control tuning more generic so it will work with buffer sizes other than the sizes in the RK3588.
  • Try to tune the AXI parameters. Almost nothing I did seemed to have a consistent effect. I think there was a small improvement by enabling address-aligned beats, though it might just be my imagination.

@idigdoug
dwc_eqos - queue tuning
88c4035 
- Try to tune the flow control on the Rx queue. Seemed to have a minor
  throughput improvement from sending pause packet at about half full.
- Make the flow control tuning more generic so it will work with buffer
  sizes other than the sizes in the RK3588.
- Try to tune the AXI parameters. Almost nothing I did seemed to have a
  consistent effect. I think there was a small improvement by enabling
  address-aligned beats, though it might just be my imagination.
@idigdoug idigdoug merged commit c094176 into master Dec 29, 2023
2 checks passed
@idigdoug idigdoug deleted the dwc_eqos_tuning branch December 29, 2023 22:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@idigdoug