-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#1367: Scalar - Replacing usage of MatcherAssert.assertThat #1371
Conversation
This pull request #1371 is assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marceloamadeu I've left some comments. I realise this would mean change a lot of things that are not really related to the todo you are solving, but still I think it's a good idea to do it. So maybe do some of them and add a todo in package-info.java
to finish replacing all the IsEqual
with ScalarHasValue
?
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1371 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 89.66% 89.66%
Complexity 1662 1662
=========================================
Files 274 274
Lines 3948 3948
Branches 211 211
=========================================
Hits 3540 3540
Misses 375 375
Partials 33 33 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@victornoel |
@marceloamadeu very nice, thank you! @paulodamaso looks good to me |
@rultor merge |
@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here |
@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 8min) |
@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @victornoel/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed |
@0crat quality good |
This PR is for #1367