Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#1367: Scalar - Replacing usage of MatcherAssert.assertThat #1371

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 5, 2020

Conversation

marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is for #1367

@marceloamadeu marceloamadeu changed the title #1367: Scalars - Replacing usage of MatcherAssert.assertThat #1367: Scalar - Replacing usage of MatcherAssert.assertThat May 3, 2020
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 3, 2020

This pull request #1371 is assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job

Copy link
Collaborator

@victornoel victornoel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marceloamadeu I've left some comments. I realise this would mean change a lot of things that are not really related to the todo you are solving, but still I think it's a good idea to do it. So maybe do some of them and add a todo in package-info.java to finish replacing all the IsEqual with ScalarHasValue?

src/test/java/org/cactoos/scalar/BoolOfTest.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/java/org/cactoos/scalar/ConstantTest.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/java/org/cactoos/scalar/EqualsTest.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/java/org/cactoos/scalar/FoldedTest.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 5, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1371 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1371   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     89.66%   89.66%           
  Complexity     1662     1662           
=========================================
  Files           274      274           
  Lines          3948     3948           
  Branches        211      211           
=========================================
  Hits           3540     3540           
  Misses          375      375           
  Partials         33       33           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fd8d5bc...a5b3326. Read the comment docs.

@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@victornoel IsEqual was replaced with ScalarHasValue and TODO was added. Please check that it is correct.
Tks

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@marceloamadeu very nice, thank you!

@paulodamaso looks good to me

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Contributor

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented May 5, 2020

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit b0bae7b into yegor256:master May 5, 2020
@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented May 5, 2020

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 8min)

@0crat 0crat added the qa label May 5, 2020
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 5, 2020

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @victornoel/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label May 5, 2020
@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat 0crat added quality/good and removed qa labels May 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants