Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For #1277: Add RepeatedProc #1399

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 4, 2020
Merged

For #1277: Add RepeatedProc #1399

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 4, 2020

Conversation

andreoss
Copy link
Contributor

For #1277
Introduced RepeatedProc

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 15, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1399 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1399      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     89.80%   89.81%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     1686     1688       +2     
============================================
  Files           275      276       +1     
  Lines          4000     4006       +6     
  Branches        211      211              
============================================
+ Hits           3592     3598       +6     
  Misses          376      376              
  Partials         32       32              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/main/java/org/cactoos/RepeatedProc.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 2.00 <2.00> (?)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 37ccd86...9612f2a. Read the comment docs.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jun 15, 2020

This pull request #1399 is assigned to @marceloamadeu/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@andreoss andreoss marked this pull request as ready for review June 15, 2020 22:56
@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

@paulodamaso looks good to me

@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

@andreoss Please correct:

ERROR: Puzzle src/main/java/org/cactoos/RepeatedProc.java:35-35 has a very short description of just 6 words while a minimum of 20 is required

@andreoss
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andreoss Please correct:

ERROR: Puzzle src/main/java/org/cactoos/RepeatedProc.java:35-35 has a very short description of just 6 words while a minimum of 20 is required

@marceloamadeu Done

@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

@paulodamaso ping

Copy link
Collaborator

@victornoel victornoel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andreoss just one more change please


/**
* Proc that repeats its calculation a few times before
* returning the last result.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andreoss a Proc does not return any result, can you fix this javadoc?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

@victornoel victornoel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andreoss it seems you added an unwanted class and also the build is broken

import java.nio.file.Paths;


public class XsltTransformer {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andreoss you incorrectly added this class apparently, can you remove it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@victornoel Fixed

@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

@andreoss Please... check Travis CI build failure.
Tks

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Jul 4, 2020

@rultor merge

@victornoel OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit 9612f2a into yegor256:master Jul 4, 2020
@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Jul 4, 2020

@rultor merge

@victornoel Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 10min)

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Jul 4, 2020
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jul 4, 2020

Code review was too long (18 days), architects (@paulodamaso, @victornoel/z) were penalized, see §55

victornoel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants