Fix required branch not specified

[skepticspriggan]

Q	A
Is bugfix?	❌
New feature?	❌
Breaks BC?	❌
Fixed issues

The git pull upstream command mentioned in the Git workflow internal docs aborts with the message:

You asked to pull from the remote 'upstream', but did not specify                             
a branch. Because this is not the default configured remote                                   
for your current branch, you must specify a branch on the command line.

[what-the-diff]

PR Summary

• Modified Git Command in Documentation
  The team has made a small but important change within our instructions for using Git in git-workflow.md. Previously, we used to mention a command git pull upstream. We have now updated it to become git pull upstream master. This makes sure that when developers pull the latest changes, they are specifically pulling from the master branch, offering a more targetted approach to keeping their local code bases updated.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.82%. Comparing base (97ca1f2) to head (0a72316).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #20143   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     64.82%   64.82%           
  Complexity    11376    11376           
=========================================
  Files           429      429           
  Lines         37074    37074           
=========================================
  Hits          24034    24034           
  Misses        13040    13040           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[samdark]

Thanks!