Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Revised] Fine-tuned CI Workflows in PR #965

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 16, 2024
Merged

[Revised] Fine-tuned CI Workflows in PR #965

merged 11 commits into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

krapie
Copy link
Member

@krapie krapie commented Aug 16, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

Revised version of fine-tuned CI workflows in PR #964, which is actions/checkout for dorny/paths-filter.

The CI failed in main branch, due to dorny/paths-filter action's behavior. It does not require checkout when triggered by PR, but it requires checkout on other triggers.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


Additional documentation:


Checklist:

  • Added relevant tests or not required
  • Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new CI job to optimize workflow execution based on file changes.
  • Improvements
    • Updated existing jobs to conditionally execute based on outcomes from the new CI job.
    • Expanded the paths monitored during CI to enhance efficiency.
    • Renamed the sharding test job for consistency in naming conventions.

@krapie krapie requested a review from hackerwins August 16, 2024 03:31
@krapie krapie self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The CI workflow in GitHub Actions has been enhanced with the addition of a new job, ci-target-check, which determines the execution of subsequent jobs based on file path changes. This improvement makes the CI process more efficient by conditionally running the build, bench, and sharding-test jobs only when relevant changes are detected. The workflow also expands the scope of monitored paths and aligns naming conventions for consistency.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml Added ci-target-check job; modified build, bench, and sharding-test jobs to depend on it; expanded ignored paths to include design/**; renamed sharding_test to sharding-test.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code where changes bloom,
A check now ensures we make less room.
With paths filtered, efficient we glide,
Only the needed will run side by side.
Hooray for the workflow, let progress be bright,
As we hop through our tasks, all feels just right! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad23c56 and 37a2401.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (5)

11-11: LGTM! Expanded paths-ignore improves CI efficiency.

Including the design/** directory in paths-ignore optimizes the CI process by preventing unnecessary runs for design changes.


20-47: LGTM! New ci-target-check job optimizes CI workflow.

The introduction of the ci-target-check job using dorny/paths-filter efficiently manages job execution based on file path changes, improving resource utilization.


52-53: LGTM! Conditional execution for build job enhances efficiency.

The build job now runs conditionally based on ci-target-check outputs, aligning with the optimized CI workflow.


99-100: LGTM! Conditional execution for bench job optimizes resource usage.

The bench job now runs conditionally based on ci-target-check outputs, contributing to a more efficient CI process.


139-144: LGTM! Renamed and optimized sharding-test job.

The sharding-test job's renaming aligns with naming conventions, and its conditional execution based on ci-target-check outputs enhances CI efficiency.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.06%. Comparing base (80c6ea0) to head (37a2401).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #965   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   51.06%   51.06%           
=======================================
  Files          73       73           
  Lines       10782    10782           
=======================================
  Hits         5506     5506           
  Misses       4725     4725           
  Partials      551      551           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@hackerwins hackerwins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution.

@hackerwins hackerwins merged commit ed6e974 into main Aug 16, 2024
5 checks passed
@hackerwins hackerwins deleted the ci-fine-tune branch August 16, 2024 04:07
raararaara pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
Revised version of fine-tuned CI workflows in PR #964, which is
actions/checkout for dorny/paths-filter.

The CI failed in main branch, due to dorny/paths-filter action's
behavior. It does not require checkout when triggered by PR, but it
requires checkout on other triggers.

---------

Co-authored-by: binary_ho <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants