apply-refact
applies refactorings specified by the
refact
package. It is currently
integrated into HLint to enable the automatic application of suggestions.
cabal install apply-refact
Alternatively, clone the repo and run cabal install
.
You can also install from Nix:
nix-env -iA nixpkgs.haskellPackages.apply-refact
Executable name is refactor
.
hlint src/Main.hs --refactor --refactor-options="--inplace"
# test.hs
foo = (x)
# hlint.refact -- produced by hlint --serialise
[("test.hs:1:7: Warning: Redundant bracket\nFound:\n (x)\nWhy not:\n
x\n",[Replace {rtype = Expr, pos = SrcSpan {startLine = 1, startCol = 7, endLine
= 1, endCol = 10}, subts = [("x",SrcSpan {startLine = 1, startCol = 8, endLine =
1, endCol = 9})], orig = "x"}])]
> refactor test.hs --refact-file hlint.refact
foo = x
One of either the input file or --refact-file
must be specified on the command
line. If an input file is specified but not --refact-file
then refactor
will
accept refactorings from stdin and vice versa.
The -i
option can be specified to perform the refactoring inplace overwriting
the input file. This option is ignored when input is read from stdin.
The -s
option can be specified to perform a stepwise evaluation of the refact
file. The user is prompted whether to perform each hint before it is performed.
The --pos
option is intended to be used by tooling in order to specify which
specific hint should be performed.
Multiple -X
options may be provided to specify additional default language pragmas which might affect parsing, such as -XLambdaCase
or -XRankNTypes
.
Refact files should be the result of show
on a value of type [(String, [Refactoring SrcSpan])]
. The string is a description of the refactoring, one
description can have many associated refactoring steps.
The executable is provide so that libraries can use apply-refact
without depending on the package.
The implementation relies on ghc-exactprint
which depends itself on GHC. A
transitive dependancy that most developers wish to avoid!
If the program produces a syntactically incorrect result then this is a bug. Please open an issue on the issue tracker with precise instructions about how to reproduce it.
- The input file
- The refact file
- The command used to invoke
refactor
There are some known problems with CPP processing. If your library contains CPP
directives other than #ifdef
it is quite likely that the result will be
unexpected.
There are also two hidden flags which can be useful for debugging.
Outputs the GHC AST.
Performs no refactoring operations on the file but is useful to test whether
unexpected formatting is due to ghc-exactprint
or the refactoring.
Contributions are welcome. You can run the tests via cabal test
.