Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: reuse cache config on chunk cache #591

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

jeqo
Copy link
Contributor

@jeqo jeqo commented Sep 11, 2024

Extend cache config with chunk cache configs (default and disk-based config) to reuse the configuration definitions.

@jeqo jeqo force-pushed the jeqo/refactor-segment-manifest-cache branch from 3b8678f to 11d4afe Compare September 12, 2024 06:34
Base automatically changed from jeqo/refactor-segment-manifest-cache to main September 13, 2024 13:30
@jeqo jeqo marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2024 13:48
@jeqo jeqo requested a review from a team as a code owner September 13, 2024 13:48
Extend cache config with chunk cache configs (default and disk-based config) to reuse the configuration definitions.
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ on:
push:
branches: [ 'main' ]
pull_request:
branches: [ 'main' ]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding this in a separate commit to allow other chained PRs to build fully instead of waiting for main to be the base branch.

Copy link
Contributor

@biggusdonzus biggusdonzus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me 👍

@biggusdonzus biggusdonzus merged commit dfedd53 into main Sep 13, 2024
9 checks passed
@biggusdonzus biggusdonzus deleted the jeqo/refactor-chunk-cache branch September 13, 2024 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants