Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workload Identity support #266

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

nlamirault
Copy link
Contributor

@nlamirault nlamirault commented Oct 14, 2022

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lamirault <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lamirault <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@lonegunmanb lonegunmanb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @nlamirault for opening this pr. We're introduced a CI pipeline for this module and now we're enforcing some code style policies. You can check whether your pr meets the requirement by reading this document and run the make pr-check command. Thanks for your understanding.

variables.tf Outdated
@@ -348,6 +348,12 @@ variable "oidc_issuer_enabled" {
default = false
}

variable "workload_identity_enabled" {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we reorder variables in alphabet order please? Thanks.

main.tf Outdated
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ resource "azurerm_kubernetes_cluster" "main" {
local_account_disabled = var.local_account_disabled
node_resource_group = var.node_resource_group
oidc_issuer_enabled = var.oidc_issuer_enabled
workload_identity_enabled = var.workload_identity_enabled
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we reorder arguments in alphabet order please? Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lamirault <[email protected]>
@nlamirault nlamirault temporarily deployed to acctests October 17, 2022 07:41 Inactive
Copy link
Member

@lonegunmanb lonegunmanb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @nlamirault , LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants