Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI-CD Updates #768

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

CI-CD Updates #768

merged 19 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

Skptak
Copy link
Member

@Skptak Skptak commented Aug 31, 2023

Description

CI-CD Updates to use new versions of the CI-CD-Github-Actions
Individual PRs can be seen at:
Complexity Check
Coverage-Cop
Executable Monitor
CSpell
Uncrustify Formatting Update
Link Verifier

Test Steps

Checklist:

  • I have tested my changes. No regression in existing tests.
  • I have modified and/or added unit-tests to cover the code changes in this Pull Request.

Related Issue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@Skptak Skptak requested a review from a team as a code owner August 31, 2023 04:35
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (d6bccb1) 94.35% compared to head (af3367a) 94.35%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #768   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.35%   94.35%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines        2446     2446           
  Branches      598      598           
=======================================
  Hits         2308     2308           
  Misses         85       85           
  Partials       53       53           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 94.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, \
portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, \
portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, \
portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE, portISR_STACK_FILL_BYTE
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs backslash?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this should actually need any of these back-slashes? The comma separation in the array should be fine without them?
@paulbartell do you know why this array is formatted this way?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was wondering the same

@Skptak Skptak merged commit 5fb9b50 into FreeRTOS:main Sep 5, 2023
15 checks passed
aggarg added a commit to Skptak/FreeRTOS-Kernel that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
Skptak added a commit to Skptak/FreeRTOS-Kernel that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
aggarg added a commit to aggarg/FreeRTOS-Kernel that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2023
@Skptak Skptak mentioned this pull request Nov 1, 2023
2 tasks
@Skptak Skptak mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2024
2 tasks
Skptak added a commit to Skptak/FreeRTOS-Kernel that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2024
aggarg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2024
aggarg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
Unnecessary white space was introduced in PR #768
which affected the formatting of assembly code. This PR
returns the correct formatting. No functional change.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants