Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for cacheKeyPolicy in BackendBuckets #6043

Conversation

genkami
Copy link
Contributor

@genkami genkami commented May 18, 2022

This PR adds support for cacheKeyPolicy in google_compute_backend_bucket.

Resolves hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11114.

This is my first PR to this repo so feel free to correct me if there is anything wrong.

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Generated Terraform, and ran make test and make lint to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

compute: added `cache_key_policy` field to `google_compute_backend_bucket` resource

Question:
After I ran make terraform, make lint fails because of the files that seem to be irrelevant to my changes. Is this an expected behavior?

output of `make lint` (hashicorp-provider-google)
$ cd /path/to/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google
$ git log -n 1 | head -n 1
commit 05616d2ee0e1e676ff042fc96187d20dcb51d9ab
$ golangci-lint --version
golangci-lint has version 1.46.2 built from a333689 on 2022-05-17T06:05:08Z
$ make lint
==> Checking source code against linters...
google/config_test.go:67:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/config_test.go:95:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/config_test.go:125:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/config_test.go:165:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_disk_test.go:188:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:21:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:125:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:153:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:221:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:288:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:369:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:449:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:518:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:586:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:659:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:731:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
google/resource_compute_instance_migrate_test.go:797:3: S1038: should use t.Skipf(...) instead of t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf(...)) (gosimple)
		t.Skip(fmt.Sprintf("Network access not allowed; use %s=1 to enable", TestEnvVar))
		^
make: *** [lint] Error 1

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented May 18, 2022

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

For more information, open the CLA check for this pull request.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello! I am a robot who works on Magic Modules PRs.

I've detected that you're a community contributor. @melinath, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to assist you and help review your changes.

❓ First time contributing? Click here for more details

Your assigned reviewer will help review your code by:

  • Ensuring it's backwards compatible, covers common error cases, etc.
  • Summarizing the change into a user-facing changelog note.
  • Passes tests, either our "VCR" suite, a set of presubmit tests, or with manual test runs.

You can help make sure that review is quick by running local tests and ensuring they're passing in between each push you make to your PR's branch. Also, try to leave a comment with each push you make, as pushes generally don't generate emails.

If your reviewer doesn't get back to you within a week after your most recent change, please feel free to leave a comment on the issue asking them to take a look! In the absence of a dedicated review dashboard most maintainers manage their pending reviews through email, and those will sometimes get lost in their inbox.


@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 6 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 186 insertions(+))
TF Validator: Diff ( 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))
TF OiCS: Diff ( 4 files changed, 117 insertions(+))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 2020
Passed tests 1792
Skipped tests: 226
Failed tests: 2

Action taken

Triggering VCR tests in RECORDING mode for the following tests that failed during VCR: TestAccComputeBackendBucket_backendBucketCacheKeyPolicyExample|TestAccCloudAssetFolderFeed_cloudAssetFolderFeedExample

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests passed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccComputeBackendBucket_backendBucketCacheKeyPolicyExample[view]

Tests failed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccCloudAssetFolderFeed_cloudAssetFolderFeedExample[view]

Please fix these to complete your PR
View the build log or the debug log for each test

Copy link
Member

@melinath melinath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good overall - the failure of TestAccCloudAssetFolderFeed_cloudAssetFolderFeedExample seems to be unrelated. Regarding the lint issues - it could be due to a different golang or golangci-lint version than what is used in CI/CD.

CI/CD versions are:

  • go 1.16
  • golangci-lint v1.40.1 (looks like you're using 1.46.2)

description: 'The CacheKeyPolicy for this CdnPolicy.'
properties:
- !ruby/object:Api::Type::Array
send_empty_value: true
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is send_empty_value set here & below?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that not setting send_empty_value causes a problem that is similar to hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#5273, but I'm not 100% sure about it because I am not quite familiar with Terraform.

@@ -166,6 +166,11 @@ overrides: !ruby/object:Overrides::ResourceOverrides
vars:
backend_bucket_name: "image-backend-bucket"
bucket_name: "image-store-bucket"
- !ruby/object:Provider::Terraform::Examples
name: "backend_bucket_cache_key_policy"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add another example that uses include_http_headers?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK. I added it!

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 257 insertions(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 257 insertions(+))
TF Validator: Diff ( 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))
TF OiCS: Diff ( 8 files changed, 234 insertions(+))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 2030
Passed tests 1801
Skipped tests: 226
Failed tests: 3

Action taken

Triggering VCR tests in RECORDING mode for the tests that failed during VCR. Click here to see the failed tests TestAccFirebaserulesRelease_BasicRelease|TestAccComputeBackendBucket_backendBucketIncludeHttpHeadersExample|TestAccComputeBackendBucket_backendBucketQueryStringWhitelistExample

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests passed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccComputeBackendBucket_backendBucketQueryStringWhitelistExample[view]
TestAccFirebaserulesRelease_BasicRelease[view]
TestAccComputeBackendBucket_backendBucketIncludeHttpHeadersExample[view]

All tests passed
View the build log or the debug log for each test

@melinath melinath self-requested a review May 26, 2022 15:24
Copy link
Member

@melinath melinath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

google_compute_backend_bucket: Add support for cacheKeyPolicy
3 participants