You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I was trying the tutorials in examples/solvers.md, I find these are probably broken.
solve seems to be good:
julia>@vars x y z
julia>solve([x + y + z -1, x + y +2*z -3 ], (x, y, z))
Dict{Any,Any} with 2 entries:
z =>2
x =>-y -1
linsolve produces an empty set (this is also shown in the notebook version of tutorial):
julia>linsolve([x + y + z -1, x + y +2*z -3 ], (x, y, z))
∅
solveset can't even run:
solveset([x + y + z -1, x + y +2*z -3 ], (x, y, z))
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching solveset(::Array{Sym,1}, ::Tuple{Sym,Sym,Sym})
Closest candidates are:solveset(::SymPy.SymbolicObject, ::Any...; kwargs...) at C:\Users\melonedo\.julia\packages\SymPy\QNFlL\src\importexport.jl:96
Stacktrace:
[1] top-level scope at REPL[17]:1
Are there any caveats in using this module?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for pointing these out. I need to integrate the examples into the testing framework, as changes to the underlying sympy package can necessitate changes to this package. I'll look into these specific issues and address. There certainly have been changes.
When I was trying the tutorials in examples/solvers.md, I find these are probably broken.
solve seems to be good:
linsolve produces an empty set (this is also shown in the notebook version of tutorial):
solveset can't even run:
Are there any caveats in using this module?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: