Add stdin option to command chains

[LucasPickering]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Right now, it's tedious to write command chains that require stdin input. For example:

chains:
  email-body:
    source: !request
      recipe: get-email
    selector: $.headers
  email-body-escaped:
    source: !command
      command: [sh, -c, "echo '{{chains.email-body}}' | jq -R -s '.'"]

The goal here is to reduce the number of use cases where users have to invoke the shell, without too much effort (see #153 for another example). This has two benefits:

• More user friendly
• Reduce cross-platform issues

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen

A new field stdin on the !command variant:

chains:
  email-body:
    source: !request
      recipe: get-email
    selector: $.headers
  email-body-escaped:
    source: !command
      command: [jq, -R, -s, '.']
      stdin: "{{chains.email-body}}"

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered

The primary alternative is doing nothing, since this is already possible by invoking the shell directly.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here

If anyone wants to implement this, the work involved is:

• Add stdin field (type Template) to ChainSource::Command
• Add logic to render the stdin value, then pipe that to the subprocess in render.rs
• Add tests in template.rs
• Add docs in chain_source.md