Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove use of iteritems method #556

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

syncrou
Copy link
Contributor

@syncrou syncrou commented Aug 6, 2019

Brings this module inline with requirements for Python 3

BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736116

Brings this module inline with requirements for Python 3
@syncrou
Copy link
Contributor Author

syncrou commented Aug 6, 2019

@miq-bot add_label bug

@miq-bot assign @carbonin

@syncrou
Copy link
Contributor Author

syncrou commented Aug 6, 2019

@miq-bot miq-bot added the bug label Aug 6, 2019
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 6, 2019

@syncrou 'carbonin' is an invalid assignee, ignoring...

@syncrou
Copy link
Contributor Author

syncrou commented Aug 6, 2019

@billfitzgerald0120 would you be able to test this on a RHEL 8 appliance?

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 6, 2019

Checked commit syncrou@ff7633e with ruby 2.4.6, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
0 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 6, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3406

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.001%) to 96.931%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3392: -0.001%
Covered Lines: 2937
Relevant Lines: 3030

💛 - Coveralls

@carbonin
Copy link
Member

carbonin commented Aug 7, 2019

Will this cause a problem with the ManageIQ appliance which is still running CentOS 7 (and thus python2)?

@syncrou
Copy link
Contributor Author

syncrou commented Aug 7, 2019

Closing. Per @carbonin's comment. Will need to validate all changes are backwards compatible with Python 2 and 3.

@syncrou syncrou closed this Aug 7, 2019
@syncrou
Copy link
Contributor Author

syncrou commented Aug 9, 2019

Closed in favor of #557 also test for backwards compatibility with Python 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants