You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wondering where the default error rate (for Illumina) of 0.05 (5%) comes from? That is awfully high for Illumina - most sources I read (and pandora) use something more like 0.001 (0.1%).
While working on mbhall88/head_to_head_pipeline#76 I tried out lowering the error rate to 0.001. It didn't have a huge impact, but all the differences were positive. We recovered one FN for Ethambutol and one FN for Rifampicin.
@martinghunt I wonder if you played with the error rate when doing the analysis for the recent paper? If not, how easy would it be to rerun it with this lowered error rate to see the impact on a bigger dataset?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm wondering where the default error rate (for Illumina) of 0.05 (5%) comes from? That is awfully high for Illumina - most sources I read (and pandora) use something more like 0.001 (0.1%).
mykrobe/src/mykrobe/base.py
Lines 124 to 130 in 59dfb97
While working on mbhall88/head_to_head_pipeline#76 I tried out lowering the error rate to 0.001. It didn't have a huge impact, but all the differences were positive. We recovered one FN for Ethambutol and one FN for Rifampicin.
@martinghunt I wonder if you played with the error rate when doing the analysis for the recent paper? If not, how easy would it be to rerun it with this lowered error rate to see the impact on a bigger dataset?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: