Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add age reference attribute #525

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 16, 2022
Merged

add age reference attribute #525

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 16, 2022

Conversation

bendichter
Copy link
Contributor

fix #412

@CodyCBakerPhD
Copy link
Contributor

Would this PR also include the lower/upper bounds or ranges?

@CodyCBakerPhD
Copy link
Contributor

Also linking: NeurodataWithoutBorders/nwbinspector#209

@bendichter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@CodyCBakerPhD this PR is solely to handle gestational age. I feel those issues are orthogonal so I'm making separate PRs. Also, the DANDI team wants to use "P90D/P100D" syntax to express age ranges which I think will work just as well and will not require changes to the schema (though it certainly will require changes to the NWB inspector and best practices)

@bendichter bendichter requested review from rly and oruebel August 15, 2022 16:17
@CodyCBakerPhD
Copy link
Contributor

Also, the DANDI team wants to use "P90D/P100D" syntax

Gotcha, I'll have those ready for the session tomorrow then

@bendichter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rly
Copy link
Contributor

rly commented Aug 15, 2022

This looks fine to me. Please add to the release notes as well.

core/nwb.file.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@oruebel oruebel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@bendichter bendichter merged commit b2fcec0 into dev Aug 16, 2022
@@ -3,6 +3,11 @@
Release Notes
=============

2.5.1 (Upcoming)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following version guidelines https://www.nwb.org/versioning-guidelines/ I believe this should be part of 2.6 as it adds functionality in a backward compatible way

Copy link
Contributor

@oruebel oruebel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also increment the version in the namespace to 2.6.0-alpha

version: "2.5.0"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

prenatal age
4 participants