-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nodePackages: regenerate with node2nix 1.9.0 #110545
Conversation
Most of it is done. There are still a bunch of packages I could get some help with:
|
@svanderburg please fix the eval error. |
@SuperSandro2000 This evaluation failure is caused by the @pacien @zowoq Could you help me fixing this package? Or alternatively, tell me how you invoke the generation script? |
The generation script of the ldgallery/viewer package can be invoked as follows: cd pkgs/tools/graphics/ldgallery/viewer
./generate.sh v2.0 |
I forgot to mention that the last four lines of ldgallery/viewer/generate.sh contain an ugly fix for the util-linux rename. Those lines probably need to be removed now that the issue is fixed in node2nix itself. |
@pacien Thanks, this seemed to do the trick. Just made a commit. I also modified these last two lines and the |
For the record once this is merged we can act on this todo (I can take care of that): it's also an example of how you can share the node-env.nix between different regeneration scripts if you need to do so. |
@turboMaCk Good one! Yes let's have a look at it as soon as the work for this PR is done. The checks now have passed. I'm currently investigating how to fix |
I made a little bit more progress with Now still facing a TypeScript compilation error:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for my packages (just trivial changes in the generated files)
- newman
- n8n
- commitizen
…t project using the package-lock.json configuration
I also fixed I believe there are no impediments anymore in getting this PR integrated. |
@svanderburg I've pulled this branch locally and was able to build spacegun 👍 Let me try to run nix-review... |
I've tried to build
Not sure if this suppose to be supported or not, I'm not using macos normally myself. I tried and it fails in master as well. I think it should be fixable by inclusion of CoreServices but I would rather consider fixing it in separate PR. spaceship also seems to have ungodly number of dependencies 😅 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@turboMaCk Judging from the kind of error, I think it's safe to conclude that it was already broken on darwin. I'm pretty sure that a change in the generator could not have caused this. |
@svanderburg it definitely was. I've tested master and it fails there as well. |
Ok, I'll leave this open for just a short while to give other people the opportunity to respond. Otherwise, I'll integrate this PR soon. |
No further comments received. I'll merge this. |
Might be related to the zigbee2mqtt change in this PR, we saw something similar in #110394 . |
@raboof This is weird. I need to investigate it. In the meantime we should probably revert with this PR: #110752 @SuperSandro2000 feel free to do the revert |
Motivation for this change
This update provides updated Nix expressions generated with node2nix 1.9.0
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)