Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Login services button colors #32570

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

yash-rajpal
Copy link
Member

@yash-rajpal yash-rajpal commented Jun 7, 2024

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

The login services button was not implementing the button color properties, so fixed it and now the login services button will render the button colors as per the settings.
image
image

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

SUP-590

Copy link
Contributor

dionisio-bot bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

  • This PR is targeting the wrong base branch. It should target 6.11.0, but it targets 6.10.0

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 7, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: bb30b5f

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 32 packages
Name Type
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration Major
@rocket.chat/meteor Minor
@rocket.chat/core-typings Minor
@rocket.chat/rest-typings Minor
@rocket.chat/apps Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services Patch
@rocket.chat/cron Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit Major
@rocket.chat/gazzodown Major
@rocket.chat/livechat Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts Major
@rocket.chat/account-service Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client Patch
@rocket.chat/license Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/presence Patch
rocketchat-services Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client Patch
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground Patch
@rocket.chat/models Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar Major
@rocket.chat/ui-client Major
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf Major
@rocket.chat/instance-status Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@yash-rajpal yash-rajpal marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2024 15:53
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.19%. Comparing base (72b8b5e) to head (bb30b5f).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #32570      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    56.85%   56.19%   -0.67%     
===========================================
  Files         2498     2470      -28     
  Lines        55346    54900     -446     
  Branches     11416    11328      -88     
===========================================
- Hits         31466    30850     -616     
- Misses       21166    21381     +215     
+ Partials      2714     2669      -45     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 55.07% <ø> (-1.42%) ⬇️
unit 72.57% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Copy link
Member

@MarcosSpessatto MarcosSpessatto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be possible to add a UI test to ensure the behavior?

@yash-rajpal yash-rajpal requested a review from a team as a code owner June 10, 2024 10:38
@scuciatto scuciatto added this to the 6.10 milestone Jun 10, 2024
Copy link
Member

@MarcosSpessatto MarcosSpessatto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't see any test assertion related to the fix, am I missing something? 🤔

@yash-rajpal
Copy link
Member Author

Tested the change of button text setting in existing tests.

@MarcosSpessatto
Copy link
Member

Tested the change of button text setting in existing tests.

But what about the issue? Isn't it about the color? 🤔 Didn't see anything mentioning the label..

@scuciatto scuciatto added the stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider label Jun 17, 2024
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added the stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge label Jun 17, 2024
@scuciatto scuciatto removed this from the 6.10 milestone Jun 19, 2024
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot removed the stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge label Jun 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dougfabris dougfabris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

During the login refactor it was a design decision to not allow such customization.

Waiting for their reply to move forward!

@yash-rajpal yash-rajpal requested a review from a team as a code owner July 8, 2024 19:07
Copy link
Member

@dougfabris dougfabris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@yash-rajpal yash-rajpal added this to the 6.11 milestone Jul 9, 2024
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added the stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge label Jul 9, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 1566412 into develop Jul 10, 2024
48 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/login-services-button-props branch July 10, 2024 01:12
yash-rajpal added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
yash-rajpal added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants