You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Of note - we happened upon trees with dendrobands that aren’t listed in the survey (and I assume there are more, as these were ones I/ Bill happened to come across). Furthermore @rudeboybert confirmed these 5 trees were not in database
172154 standing dead
172626 Fram standing dead top broke
172587 Fram standing dead top broke
92006 37.99mm
92138 9.97mm
From Bill:
i would also mention there about 20 standing dead trees with dendrobands. it is a struggle to reach many of those trees and life would be simpler if the bands were removed once the tree dies.
to do:
check what happened with #92006 and #92138. Perhaps these were erroneously marked dead? Assuming these are live (right, @jenajordan ?), they should be returned to the census
remove all dead trees from census list
physically remove bands from dead trees
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We need to ensure (1) that dead trees are removed from the census, and (2) that trees removed are really dead.
notes from 2021 fall census:
From @jenajordan:
Of note - we happened upon trees with dendrobands that aren’t listed in the survey (and I assume there are more, as these were ones I/ Bill happened to come across). Furthermore @rudeboybert confirmed these 5 trees were not in database
172154 standing dead
172626 Fram standing dead top broke
172587 Fram standing dead top broke
92006 37.99mm
92138 9.97mm
From Bill:
i would also mention there about 20 standing dead trees with dendrobands. it is a struggle to reach many of those trees and life would be simpler if the bands were removed once the tree dies.
to do:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: