-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
so ADJ that ADVCL #106
Comments
* Resolves GUM cases of UniversalDependencies/UD_English-EWT#106
Agreed, "that" isn't actually required, so here's a broader query: http://match.grew.fr/[email protected]&custom=5fb537e7b3d81&eud=yes e.g. these demons are so GREEDY, they want as much of their "product" as they can get I didn't find any "enough" + ccomp examples. |
Good point, just ran that search on GUM and corrected cases without "that" (see amir-zeldes/gum@81ee754 ) |
I agree that |
Updated queries:
|
|
There is only one case of "so ADJ that ADVCL" annotated as such in the corpus:
advcl
will send the message that everything is OKhttp://match.grew.fr/[email protected]&custom=5fb5361c6ef6b&eud=yes
But there are a few more which I think are incorrectly annotated as
ccomp
:Some of these are false positives (adjectives introducing direct speech etc.), but a few have the same structure as the case above, for example:
ccomp
to go back ..... (should be beadvcl
?)http://match.grew.fr/[email protected]&custom=5fb5353b66cc8&eud=yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: