-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check comparatives #299
Labels
Comments
Closed
nschneid
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 11, 2023
nschneid
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2023
nschneid
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2023
than+PP: 1 error in GUM (the No/No instance of https://universal.grew.fr/?custom=652ae2116d99d) |
Fixed upstream, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I think it is necessary to do a systematic review of comparative constructions in EWT. A lot of the attachments of the 2nd part of the comparison have been updated to meet the v2 guidelines for comparatives, but not all of them.
e.g.
Similarly, it would be good to investigate sufficiency constructions ("enough", "too", etc.), which are not yet officially documented (UniversalDependencies/docs#672) but presumably should use a similar structure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: