Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check comparatives #299

Closed
nschneid opened this issue Jan 23, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Check comparatives #299

nschneid opened this issue Jan 23, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@nschneid
Copy link
Contributor

nschneid commented Jan 23, 2022

I think it is necessary to do a systematic review of comparative constructions in EWT. A lot of the attachments of the 2nd part of the comparison have been updated to meet the v2 guidelines for comparatives, but not all of them.

e.g.

Similarly, it would be good to investigate sufficiency constructions ("enough", "too", etc.), which are not yet officially documented (UniversalDependencies/docs#672) but presumably should use a similar structure.

@nschneid
Copy link
Contributor Author

nschneid commented Sep 11, 2023

@nschneid
Copy link
Contributor Author

nschneid commented Oct 14, 2023

Related: #106, #423

@nschneid
Copy link
Contributor Author

than+PP: 1 error in GUM (the No/No instance of https://universal.grew.fr/?custom=652ae2116d99d)

@amir-zeldes
Copy link
Contributor

than+PP: 1 error in GUM (the No/No instance of https://universal.grew.fr/?custom=652ae2116d99d)

Fixed upstream, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants