-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edeprels from reduced relative clauses #392
Comments
…lement has multiple edeps already (#392)
^ this commit supports the script in #474 by avoiding ambiguity between multiple edeps, one of which is for the RC |
This sounds interesting - would you be able to make a depedit version of this addition for the GU corpora enhancer? |
You mean for amir-zeldes/gum#114? I don't know the extent to which adding the missing edeps can be automated. @xiulinyang is looking at this. |
Oh, this is manual? nvm I somehow understood that there was a script from the above. |
The script uses the edeprels that are already there to add construction information. But a lot are still missing, and with relative clauses there are many corner cases. |
See also #388 |
EUD edges for reduced relatives, and Cxn indicating relative clause type (#392)
RRCs lack a relativizer to receive the relative clause dependency in Basic Dependencies, so we have to use heuristics to infer it.
http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=643c5c7377d9f
Need to check for whether the RC is passive, whether it has a stranded preposition, whether it has a subject, etc.
If the RC has a subordinate clause on its own, manual checking may be necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: