Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing or incorrect enhanced dependencies in relative clauses #388

Open
1 of 6 tasks
nschneid opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 6 tasks

Missing or incorrect enhanced dependencies in relative clauses #388

nschneid opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@nschneid
Copy link
Contributor

nschneid commented Feb 19, 2023

Overt relativizer has no E:ref

Many of these are adverbial relativizers. At the moment I am particularly worried about "that".

  • EWT - tricky non-adverb ones involve copular RCs
  • GUM - "that": 26 where PronType=Rel looks incorrect or enhanced edges are missing; "who": 3

Missing enhanced relation from the relative clause predicate to the relativized element (typically E:nsubj, E:nsubj:pass, E:obj, or E:obl:*)

Extraction from doubly embedded predicate with overt relativizer - enhanced relation is wrong or missing

Missing enhanced relation whatsoever

amir-zeldes added a commit to amir-zeldes/gum that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2023
  * Cases like "The thing that I want you to do" should get the ref edge and external dependency
  * Fixes GUM cases in UniversalDependencies/UD_English-EWT#388
@nschneid nschneid added the edeps label Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant