AVM: Added the TypeEnum table back to docs

[nullun]

The TypeEnum table appears to have been removed in 95c5b0e which I believe was a mistake?

thought this was docs repo

[jannotti]

This sounds like a mistake, but can't be fixed by editing TEAL_opcodes.md directly. That file is autogenerated (that's why the codegen_verification check failed in CI).

However, I'm not positive it's a mistake. Does the table appear in the docs elsewhere? I seem to recall messing around with the table generation and thought at least one table did not belong where it was placed.

[nullun]

This sounds like a mistake, but can't be fixed by editing TEAL_opcodes.md directly. That file is autogenerated (that's why the codegen_verification check failed in CI).

Ah, that makes sense.

However, I'm not positive it's a mistake. Does the table appear in the docs elsewhere? I seem to recall messing around with the table generation and thought at least one table did not belong where it was placed.

I had checked TEAL_opcodes.md and couldn't find the TypeEnum table anywhere else. There is a named_integer_constants.md file that contains it, but that's only included in README_in.md and subsequently in README.md. Maybe the note for TypeEnum in the transaction field table should be changed instead?

[jannotti]

There is a named_integer_constants.md file that contains it, but that's only included in README_in.md and subsequently in README.md. Maybe the note for TypeEnum in the transaction field table should be changed instead?

Yeah, I think that was my reasoning. It didn't seem right to have this table where it was, implying it was specific to txn. These constants can be used in other places too, like int. I'll change the note.

[nullun]

I made myself more familiar with how it works and it's much clearer to me now. I just add a commit with an updated note and some extra text beneath the table. But happy to close this pr if you're on it.

[jannotti]

#4260