Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[backport/2.3] Upgrade black version (#424) #446

Conversation

gravesm
Copy link
Member

@gravesm gravesm commented Apr 28, 2022

Depends-On: ansible/ansible-zuul-jobs#1515

Upgrade black version

SUMMARY

Move off of beta version of black and pin to current calendar year
version.
The only manual changes here are to tox.ini. Everything else is from running the new version of black.

ISSUE TYPE

COMPONENT NAME

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Kasurde
(cherry picked from commit 7c71436)

Upgrade black version

SUMMARY

Move off of beta version of black and pin to current calendar year
version.
The only manual changes here are to tox.ini. Everything else is from running the new version of black.

ISSUE TYPE

COMPONENT NAME

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Kasurde <None>
(cherry picked from commit 7c71436)
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed.

@gravesm
Copy link
Member Author

gravesm commented Apr 28, 2022

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed.

@gravesm
Copy link
Member Author

gravesm commented Apr 28, 2022

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed.

@gravesm
Copy link
Member Author

gravesm commented Apr 28, 2022

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed.

@gravesm
Copy link
Member Author

gravesm commented Apr 29, 2022

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed.

@gravesm
Copy link
Member Author

gravesm commented Apr 29, 2022

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed.

@goneri
Copy link
Member

goneri commented Apr 29, 2022

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build succeeded.

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build succeeded (gate pipeline).

@softwarefactory-project-zuul softwarefactory-project-zuul bot merged commit 68d45af into ansible-collections:stable-2.3 Apr 29, 2022
@gravesm gravesm deleted the backport/2.3/424 branch April 29, 2022 17:51
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2022
#440)

[backport/2.3] fix issue when using k8s_drain with disable_eviction set to yes (#418)

Depends-On: #446
fix issue when using k8s_drain with disable_eviction set to yes
SUMMARY
fixes #416
ISSUE TYPE
Bugfix Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME
k8s_drain
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Kasurde 
(cherry picked from commit 074f0a6)
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2022
[backport/2.3] Remove omit from template resource (#432)

Depends-On: #446
Remove omit value from template args
SUMMARY
While defining resource using template parameter, the code does not remove the omit value if any.
This fix adds a post process to remove any omit value from the resource definition.
fixes #431
ISSUE TYPE
Bugfix Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME
k8s*
Reviewed-by: Mike Graves [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Kasurde 
(cherry picked from commit 882e672)
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2022
[backport/2.3] Change line in doc fragment yaml (#439)

Depends-On: #446
Change line in doc fragment yaml
SUMMARY
For whatever reason, the one line in this doc fragment leads to sanity
failures in the redhat.openshift collection, which uses this fragment.
The downstream build process for that collection creates yaml that
appears to be valid, but that fails to lint. I'm not sure exactly which
tool the problem is in, but the easiest solution is to just remove the
single quotes here.
ISSUE TYPE
Docs Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Kasurde 
(cherry picked from commit b5cfc85)
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2022
)

[backport/2.3] continue waiting when an exception is raised (#408)

Depends-On: #446
Continue waiting when an exception is raised
SUMMARY
When an exception is raised and the wait_timeout is not reached, we should continue waiting as this may occurs due to temporary issue on cluster
Fixes #407
ISSUE TYPE
Bugfix Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Reviewed-by: Mike Graves [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Kasurde 
(cherry picked from commit f418353)
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2022
…tion (#434) (#444)

[backport/2.3] k8s - fix issue when try to delete resources using label_selectors op…

Depends-On: #446
k8s - fix issue when try to delete resources using label_selectors
SUMMARY
The kubernetes dynamic client has label_selector parameter for the delete method, however based on the documentation of REST API we cannot delete resources using labelSelector option, this fix update the way the resources are deleted. The list of resources are deleted one after another like in the kubectl go client.
Fixes #428
ISSUE TYPE
Bugfix Pull Request
Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Kasurde 
(cherry picked from commit f2f4b66)
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2022
[backport/2.3] k8s_cp - fix issue when using local_path (#422)

Depends-On: #446
k8s_cp - fix issue when using local_path
SUMMARY
When copying from local path to pod, the file is found on the controller node instead of the managed node.
This PR aims to resolve this issue.
Fixes #421
ISSUE TYPE
Bugfix Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME
k8s_cp
Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Kasurde 
Reviewed-by: Mike Graves [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 1d05cf5)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants