Ansys Edb Service as stand alone package

[SMoraisAnsys]

Extract the code related to gRPC Ansys Edb Service from pyedb.
The resulting project should be a stand alone package used as a dependency of pyedb.

Changes from original repo:

• the protobuf version user is 3.19.3 (downgraded from 3.20) to be consistent with ansys_tools_protoc_helper which strictly depends on 3.19.3
• the build system leverages ansys_tools_protoc_helper;
• ignore autogenerated python code (pb2.py and pb2.pyi)
• update licence year
• rename package info to use v0 instead of v1 (package renammed ansys.api.edb.v0)
• import have been rewritten to match import "ansys/api/edb/v0/*.proto"
• lint associated:
  • material_def.proto: rename materialDef -> material_def; propertyId -> property_id
  • package_def.proto: rename GetTherm_Cond -> GetThermCond; SetTherm_Cond -> SetThermCond; GetTheta_JB -> GetThetaJB; SetTheta_JB -> SetThetaJB; GetTheta_JC -> GetThetaJC; SetTheta_JC -> SetThetaJC

[hiro727]

as discussed offline, let's use

• v1 instead of v0 (requires server side changes)
• remove lint related changes (requires server side changes)

looks good with

• protobuf 3.19.3
• absolute imports

[SMoraisAnsys]

@hiro727 Thanks for the feedback, I'll split this PR into two parts (one to be accepted, the other as pending).
Can you send me feedback on ansys/pyedb-core#312 so that I can check both at the same time ?

[drewm102]

@hiro727 Thanks for the feedback, I'll split this PR into two parts (one to be accepted, the other as pending). Can you send me feedback on ansys/pyedb-core#312 so that I can check both at the same time ?

@SMoraisAnsys Just to double check, did you mean to reference the pull request fix circular imports #313 or the issue Circular import error when importing terminal #312? I wanted to make sure I'm putting my comments in the right place. Thanks!

[SMoraisAnsys]

@hiro727 Thanks for the feedback, I'll split this PR into two parts (one to be accepted, the other as pending). Can you send me feedback on ansys/pyedb-core#312 so that I can check both at the same time ?

@SMoraisAnsys Just to double check, did you mean to reference the pull request fix circular imports #313 or the issue Circular import error when importing terminal #312? I wanted to make sure I'm putting my comments in the right place. Thanks!

When hiroki was speaking about sbolute imports I though he was refering to the circular import issue. However that was a mistake. He was speaking about having absolute imports on client side while having something different on server side. Sorry for the confusion :s

[SMoraisAnsys]

Closing this PR as it is split between changes accepted #2 and changes to be performed later on #3.