Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Now PyAEDT Cutout keeps the path as lines after the cutout #3801

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

maxcapodi78
Copy link
Collaborator

@maxcapodi78 maxcapodi78 commented Oct 26, 2023

Now PyAEDT Cutout keeps the path as lines after the cutout instead of converting them to polygon data.

@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

@github-actions github-actions bot added the edb label Oct 26, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3801 (38d0589) into main (5507831) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 85.71%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3801      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.11%   81.08%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         180      180              
  Lines       62050    62155     +105     
==========================================
+ Hits        50334    50399      +65     
- Misses      11716    11756      +40     

@MaxJPRey MaxJPRey changed the title Now PyAEDT Cutout keeps the path as lines after the cutout instead of… Now PyAEDT Cutout keeps the path as lines after the cutout Oct 26, 2023
pyaedt/edb.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@maxcapodi78 maxcapodi78 merged commit c8a3ace into main Oct 26, 2023
12 checks passed
@maxcapodi78 maxcapodi78 deleted the improve_cutout branch October 26, 2023 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants