Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AIRFLOW-5315] TaskInstance now only overwrites executor_config when explicitly told… #5926

Merged

Conversation

dimberman
Copy link
Contributor

… to do so

Make sure you have checked all steps below.

Jira

  • My PR addresses the following Airflow Jira issues and references them in the PR title. For example, "[AIRFLOW-XXX] My Airflow PR"
    • https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-5315
    • In case you are fixing a typo in the documentation you can prepend your commit with [AIRFLOW-XXX], code changes always need a Jira issue.
    • In case you are proposing a fundamental code change, you need to create an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP).
    • In case you are adding a dependency, check if the license complies with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.

Description

  • Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI changes:

Fixes a bug where a user is unable to update executor_configs for TaskInstances

Tests

  • My PR adds the following unit tests OR does not need testing for this extremely good reason:

Commits

  • My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines, and I have squashed multiple commits if they address the same issue. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "How to write a good git commit message":
    1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
    2. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
    3. Subject does not end with a period
    4. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
    5. Body wraps at 72 characters
    6. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"

Documentation

  • In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes how to use it.
    • All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain docstrings that explain what it does
    • If you implement backwards incompatible changes, please leave a note in the Updating.md so we can assign it to a appropriate release

Code Quality

  • Passes flake8

@dimberman dimberman requested a review from kaxil August 27, 2019 13:49
@dimberman dimberman force-pushed the AIRFLOW-5315_executor-config-refresh-bug branch from b8dd58a to 68ea075 Compare August 27, 2019 13:50
@dimberman dimberman force-pushed the AIRFLOW-5315_executor-config-refresh-bug branch from 68ea075 to 7bd4fce Compare August 27, 2019 14:10
@dimberman dimberman force-pushed the AIRFLOW-5315_executor-config-refresh-bug branch from 7bd4fce to c5c0882 Compare August 27, 2019 14:12
Copy link
Member

@kaxil kaxil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@kaxil
Copy link
Member

kaxil commented Aug 27, 2019

I won't mind if we remove executor_config altogether from the TaskInstance table, so that it always uses the latest value.

Currently, it is only used in k8s executor AFAIK. Might need a note in UPDATING.md

@dimberman dimberman merged commit c8ea096 into apache:master Aug 27, 2019
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
@dimberman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kaxil where would you want to move it?

@kaxil
Copy link
Member

kaxil commented Aug 29, 2019

I mean I am not able to find a use-case where we want the executor_config value to be refreshed from DB, so I do not mind if we simply remove it from DB and by default always take the latest value.

However, I am fine with the current change as well :)

kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2019
Jerryguo pushed a commit to Jerryguo/airflow that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2019
…explicitly told… (apache#5926)

* TaskInstance now only overwrites executor_config when explicitly told to do so

* flake8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants