Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-15095] [SQL] remove HiveSessionHook from ThriftServer #12881

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

davies
Copy link
Contributor

@davies davies commented May 3, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove HiveSessionHook

How was this patch tested?

No tests needed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 3, 2016

Test build #57678 has finished for PR 12881 at commit 9709675.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@davies
Copy link
Contributor Author

davies commented May 3, 2016

cc @rxin

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented May 4, 2016

Thanks - merging in master/branch-2.0.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove HiveSessionHook

## How was this patch tested?

No tests needed.

Author: Davies Liu <[email protected]>

Closes #12881 from davies/remove_hooks.

(cherry picked from commit 348c138)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 348c138 May 4, 2016
@azeroth2b
Copy link

Are there any planned hooks for SparkSession? If so, why were the Hive hooks removed prior to replacements?

srowen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2019
…m ThriftServer

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

#12881 removed `HiveSessionHook`. But there are still some code related to `HiveSessionHook`.
This PR removes all `HiveSessionHook` related code.

## How was this patch tested?

manual tests

Closes #23957 from wangyum/SPARK-15095.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants