fix(database): allow filtering by UUID

[betodealmeida]

SUMMARY

I found a regression where we can longer filter databases by the UUID. While this functionality is not used by Superset, the Preset CLI relies on it (and is used not just with Preset workspaces, but with standalone Superset deployments for multiple reasons).

This PR brings back the functionality, and adds a unit test to prevent future breakage.

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

N/A

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

Run something like:

http://localhost:8089/api/v1/database/?q=(filters:!((col:uuid,opr:eq,value:%276ae566ae36f64a19a210621253414d03%27),(col:changed_by,opr:rel_o_m,value:1)),order_column:changed_on_delta_humanized,order_direction:desc,page:0,page_size:25)

And verify that it works.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

• Has associated issue:
• Required feature flags:
• Changes UI
• Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
  • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
  • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
  • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
• Introduces new feature or API
• Removes existing feature or API

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (494068b) 67.04% compared to head (9badf5a) 69.16%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26469      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.04%   69.16%   +2.12%     
==========================================
  Files        1948     1948              
  Lines       76062    76062              
  Branches     8493     8493              
==========================================
+ Hits        50995    52609    +1614     
+ Misses      22887    21273    -1614     
  Partials     2180     2180              

Flag	Coverage Δ
hive	53.68% <ø> (ø)
javascript	56.50% <ø> (ø)
mysql	78.06% <ø> (ø)
postgres	78.16% <ø> (ø)
presto	53.63% <ø> (?)
python	82.86% <ø> (+4.41%)	⬆️
sqlite	77.75% <ø> (ø)
unit	55.89% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[villebro]

Tagging the PR that caused the regression: #25961 For future reference, it's probably a good idea to always explicitly specify all searchable columns when creating new API classes to avoid regressions like this.