Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: deploy 1.3.0-rc0 to arbitrum and arbitrumGoerli #499

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 30, 2023

Conversation

heueristik
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist:

  • I have selected the correct base branch.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.
  • I ran all tests with success and extended them if necessary.
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md file in the root folder.
  • I have updated the DEPLOYMENT_CHECKLIST file in the root folder.
  • I have updated the UPDATE_CHECKLIST file in the root folder.

mathewmeconry and others added 13 commits August 28, 2023 10:25
* fix: added missing virtual keywords.

* fix: correct misspelled filename

* docs: improved NatSpec

* chore: bump package versions

* Update packages/contracts/CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Mathias Scherer <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Mathias Scherer <[email protected]>
* feat: deploy v1.3.0-rc0 to sepolia

* feat: bump subgraph version to v1.3.0-rc0
feat: deploy sepolia subgraph

* fix(OS-638): fixes typo in implementation

* chore: fix formatting in helpers script
Co-authored-by: Mathias Scherer <[email protected]>
@mathewmeconry mathewmeconry merged commit a7c9315 into develop Nov 30, 2023
16 checks passed
@mathewmeconry mathewmeconry deleted the feature/arbitrum-deployment branch November 30, 2023 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants