-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Update ro.Status.ALB when first creating rollout object #1986
Merged
perenesenko
merged 15 commits into
argoproj:master
from
zachaller:fix-alb-ro-status-update
Jul 22, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ba9c501
fix: make sure we update rollout.Status.ALB when first create Rollout…
zachaller 02f04b1
Refactor check for if we should verify alb.
zachaller b75638e
lint
zachaller 08aaba4
Fix tests
zachaller a71a581
Add new test for ShouldVerifyWeight
zachaller 8180ad4
Fix logic
zachaller 9f5d1b8
Add test for where we do not need to verify weight and its already set
zachaller 0677680
fix up review comments
zachaller ed2e177
fix tests
zachaller a3305ce
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/argoproj/argo-rollouts in…
zachaller 21c2cfd
fix bad merge
zachaller fae4645
Fix test
zachaller f2ce51f
Fix test
zachaller a1735a8
Clearer function name
zachaller c1cd376
Clean up if logic
zachaller File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could the line #197 be moved under this block?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So originally all I changed was removing the outer if block. I have one concern about moving it to inside that block and that is I think I would also need to move it to set it back to false case as well which seems then better to leave it where it's at.