Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(trajectory_follower/trajectory_follower_nodes): remove autoware_auto_common dependency #2228

Conversation

takayuki5168
Copy link
Contributor

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 commented Nov 7, 2022

Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka [email protected]

Description

related to #2229

remove autoware_auto_common dependency, which is added in autoware.auto, from trajectory_follower/trajectory_follower_nodes

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2022 13:25
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 11.14% // Head: 11.64% // Increases project coverage by +0.50% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (b451cab) compared to base (8f8ec9d).
Patch coverage: 59.65% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2228      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   11.14%   11.64%   +0.50%     
==========================================
  Files        1203     1203              
  Lines       86268    87070     +802     
  Branches    20829    21390     +561     
==========================================
+ Hits         9615    10140     +525     
- Misses      66490    66563      +73     
- Partials    10163    10367     +204     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential 40.32% <54.58%> (?)
total 11.12% <51.40%> (ø) Carriedforward from 8f8ec9d

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ctory_follower/include/trajectory_follower/mpc.hpp 42.85% <ø> (-3.81%) ⬇️
...wer/include/trajectory_follower/mpc_trajectory.hpp 60.00% <ø> (+10.00%) ⬆️
...rajectory_follower/pid_longitudinal_controller.hpp 50.00% <ø> (+21.42%) ⬆️
...e/trajectory_follower/qp_solver/qp_solver_osqp.hpp 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ory_follower/qp_solver/qp_solver_unconstr_fast.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...llower/include/trajectory_follower/smooth_stop.hpp 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...r/vehicle_model/vehicle_model_bicycle_dynamics.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...vehicle_model/vehicle_model_bicycle_kinematics.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...odel/vehicle_model_bicycle_kinematics_no_delay.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
control/trajectory_follower/src/mpc_trajectory.cpp 76.47% <ø> (ø)
... and 49 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@takayuki5168
Copy link
Contributor Author

I confirmed locally that planning simulator works well

Copy link
Contributor

@TakaHoribe TakaHoribe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It worked well.

Note: the motion_common was temporally ported to support .auto pkgs when the autoware.universe started. Since now the utility functions are managed by other packages (autoware_utils, motion_utils, etc), the old motion_common dependency is removed.

Using the defined types are still under discussion in the autoware.core, but at least it is not necessary in the universe. The control node uses the default premitive types to follow the other packages.

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 force-pushed the refactor/remove-autoware-auto-common-from-control branch from f71e442 to f14f38d Compare November 8, 2022 06:30
…are_auto_common dependency

Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka <[email protected]>
@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 force-pushed the refactor/remove-autoware-auto-common-from-control branch from f14f38d to 6cb6131 Compare November 9, 2022 16:13
@takayuki5168
Copy link
Contributor Author

I confirmed that planning simulator works well locally

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 enabled auto-merge (squash) November 9, 2022 16:19
Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka <[email protected]>
@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 merged commit 536a958 into autowarefoundation:main Nov 9, 2022
@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 deleted the refactor/remove-autoware-auto-common-from-control branch November 9, 2022 16:55
HansRobo pushed a commit to HansRobo/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2022
…are_auto_common dependency (autowarefoundation#2228)

Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kotaro Yoshimoto <[email protected]>
YoshiRi pushed a commit to YoshiRi/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2023
…are_auto_common dependency (autowarefoundation#2228)

Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yoshiri <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants