feat(planning_test_utils): add planning interface test manager for some obstacle modules

[kyoichi-sugahara]

Description

background

There are many cases where planning nodes die when they input an empty trajectory, a trajectory with only one point, or a trajectory where the points are duplicated.

purpose

To prevent these errors in advance, added tests to each node(some obstacle modules in this PR) to ensure that they do not crash when irregular trajectories is given. Confirmed that the process works properly by providing a normal trajectory as input before giving an irregular trajectory and outputting the necessary information for subsequent processing.

diagram

Here is an example of obstacle_cruise_planner_node and a diagram showing the test process.
The confirmation of normal operation is verified following the diagram and flow below.

Verification of behavior for irregular inputs is confirmed by following the diagram and flow below.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 34.88% and project coverage change: +0.43 🎉

Comparison is base (f210e40) 11.92% compared to head (a073874) 12.35%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3076      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   11.92%   12.35%   +0.43%     
==========================================
  Files        1332     1336       +4     
  Lines       92934    92937       +3     
  Branches    24735    26635    +1900     
==========================================
+ Hits        11079    11486     +407     
+ Misses      70376    69342    -1034     
- Partials    11479    12109     +630     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	5.82% <34.88%> (?)
total	11.92% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from 88bda80

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...test/test_obstacle_stop_planner_node_interface.cpp	10.52% <10.52%> (ø)
...st/test_obstacle_cruise_planner_node_interface.cpp	11.76% <11.76%> (ø)
..._manager/planning_interface_test_manager_utils.hpp	37.14% <37.14%> (ø)
...test_utils/src/planning_interface_test_manager.cpp	48.27% <48.27%> (ø)

... and 29 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[TakaHoribe]

@kyoichi-sugahara Thank you for your work.
Overall, LGTM. The name manager sounds too much for this function. Could it be utils or something like that?

[kyoichi-sugahara]

@TakaHoribe
Thank you!
I changed package name and I have made the necessary changes to adapt to other modules and confirmed that the tests have passed.