Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add the ability to mock DynamoDB operations #3450

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

96malhar
Copy link
Contributor

@96malhar 96malhar commented Aug 21, 2024

Description

This PR merges all DynamoDB mockability PRs from its feature branch into v4-development.
feature/v4-ddb-mock has been rebased on top of v4-development as of 8/21/2024.

Motivation and Context

DOTNET-7527

Testing

  • All Unit Tests and Integration Tests pass locally
  • Successful Dry Run

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have read the README document
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

96malhar and others added 7 commits August 26, 2024 10:38
* Add the ability to mock DocumentBatchGet and MultiTableDocumentBatchGet operations

* Add the ability to mock DocumentBatchWrite and MultiTableDocumentBatchWrite operations

* Add the ability to mock DocumentTransactGet and MultiTableDocumentTransactGet operations

* Add the ability to mock DocumentTransactWrite and MultiTableDocumentTransactWrite operations

* Add the ability to mock Search operations in Document model

* Add the ability to mock Table operations in Document model

* Fix typos
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants