Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #46 By increment existing TaskProgressModel instances #68

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jedie
Copy link
Collaborator

@jedie jedie commented Jan 28, 2022

Don't create a new TaskProgressModel instances for every ProcessInfo.update() call and increment a
existing TaskProgressModel instances. So we will not flood the database ;)

Based on #67

Don't create a new TaskProgressModel instances for every `ProcessInfo.update()` call and increment a
existing TaskProgressModel instances. So we will not flood the database ;)

Based on #67
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 28, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #68 (3ebd73c) into master (3481a79) will increase coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #68      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.46%   83.56%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines         786      791       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          656      661       +5     
  Misses        130      130              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
huey_monitor/tqdm.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
huey_monitor_tests/tests/test_tqdm.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3481a79...3ebd73c. Read the comment docs.

@phihag phihag merged commit c73031c into master Jan 28, 2022
@phihag phihag deleted the merge#67 branch January 28, 2022 08:07
@Skrattoune
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks a lot! I'll test and update now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants