Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(22.04): fix arch specific paths for openjdk-8 #149

Merged

Conversation

cjdcordeiro
Copy link
Collaborator

Certain paths were not valid for all architectures. This PR adds the arch-specific constraints.
@vpa1977 can you pls double check if it makes sense?

@cjdcordeiro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

P.S. @rebornplusplus we need to start skipping in these cases as this is a false positive.

@vpa1977
Copy link

vpa1977 commented Feb 25, 2024

Same as comment as #149

Copy link
Member

@rebornplusplus rebornplusplus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks!

P.S. @rebornplusplus we need to start skipping in these cases as this is a false positive.

Raised #151.

slices/openjdk-8-jre-headless.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cjdcordeiro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@linostar could you please have a look? Note that the failure is expected cause the pkg doesn't exist for that arch

@cjdcordeiro cjdcordeiro self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@linostar linostar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@cjdcordeiro cjdcordeiro merged commit 469289b into canonical:ubuntu-22.04 Feb 28, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@cjdcordeiro cjdcordeiro deleted the 22.04-fix-arch-openjdk branch February 28, 2024 15:46
gregory-schiano pushed a commit to gregory-schiano/chisel-releases that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2024
cjdcordeiro added a commit to ozanmakes/chisel-releases that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants