Update top-level README: post meeting 92, including status review #856
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rphair
changed the title
Crypto2099
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2024
rphair
added
the
Bi-Weekly Notes / Editorial Housekeeping
rphair
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Merges:
Promotions:
ripemd_160into Plutus #826Also @Ryun1 @Crypto2099 in light of #854 I've compared all statuses listed in the top level
READMEwith the document statuses & found a bunch of them out of sync... generally from #389 which didn't update the table in each descendant PR branch. I've kept these in a separate (the first) commit so they can be read separately for confirmation.