-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Synchronously de-assert asynchronous reset #428
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We can only model a synchronous deassertion of an asynchronous reset. This manifests itself when we use a reset synchronizer: When we do a synchronous deassertion of the reset, the HDL simulation and Clash simulation would differ; where the HDL simulation corresponds to how the actual circuit would behave. i.e. the Clash simulation was wrong! The reason for this is that we modeled a register with an asynchronous reset as if its reset line was always asynchronously deasserted. Given that we can only create synchronous systems in Clash, it made no sense that the model of the register behaved like this. We now model a register with an asynchronous reset as if its reset line is always synchronously deasserted, and the HDL primitive for the `asyncResetGen` is updated accordingly (i.e. it deasserts synchronously), so that the Clash and HDL simulation agree.
christiaanb
force-pushed
the
synchronous-deassertion
branch
from
November 23, 2018 11:22
a41adeb
to
8af8231
Compare
martijnbastiaan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2018
We can only model a synchronous deassertion of an asynchronous reset. This manifests itself when we use a reset synchronizer: When we do a synchronous deassertion of the reset, the HDL simulation and Clash simulation would differ; where the HDL simulation corresponds to how the actual circuit would behave. i.e. the Clash simulation was wrong! The reason for this is that we modeled a register with an asynchronous reset as if its reset line was always asynchronously deasserted. Given that we can only create synchronous systems in Clash, it made no sense that the model of the register behaved like this. We now model a register with an asynchronous reset as if its reset line is always synchronously deasserted, and the HDL primitive for the `asyncResetGen` is updated accordingly (i.e. it deasserts synchronously), so that the Clash and HDL simulation agree.
martijnbastiaan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2019
PR #428 does this for `assert`, but didn't account for `assertBitVector`.
martijnbastiaan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2019
PR #428 does this for `assert`, but didn't account for `assertBitVector`.
martijnbastiaan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2019
PR #428 does this for `assert`, but didn't account for `assertBitVector`. Also updates verilog/systemverilog blackboxes.
martijnbastiaan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2019
PR #428 does this for `assert`, but didn't account for `assertBitVector`. Also updates verilog/systemverilog blackboxes.
martijnbastiaan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2019
PR #428 does this for `assert`, but didn't account for `assertBitVector`. Also updates verilog/systemverilog blackboxes.
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We can only model a synchronous deassertion of an asynchronous reset. This manifests itself when we use a reset synchronizer:
When we do a synchronous deassertion of the reset, the HDL simulation and Clash simulation would differ; where the HDL simulation corresponds to how the actual circuit would behave. i.e. the Clash simulation was wrong!
The reason for this is that we modeled a register with an asynchronous reset as if its reset line was always asynchronously deasserted. Given that we can only create synchronous systems in Clash, it made no sense that the model of the register behaved like this.
We now model a register with an asynchronous reset as if its reset line is always synchronously deasserted, and the HDL primitive for the
asyncResetGen
is updated accordingly (i.e. it deasserts synchronously), so that the Clash and HDL simulation agree.