on basics/type-qualifiers - example's writeln output consistency - proposal

[astoliar]

(this issues was presented at dlang-tour/spanish#23)

I think this is a small issue of consistency in the example that might confuse someone.

The example is about mutability qualifiers but also shows how to use the typeof( .. ).tostring() to obtain a human-readable string of that type. At line 18 it says:

const int* cm = &m;
writeln("cm: ", typeof(cm).stringof);

and few lines down (line 37) it says:

const int* cv = &v;
writeln("*cv: ", typeof(cv).stringof);

there is no consistency between the two sections of the example. If the first writln text is correct then the text of the second writeln should say "cv" and not "*cv". You know, the output of typeof(*cv).stringof is not the same that typeof(cv).stringof, like "*cv: const(int*)" is not the same that "cv: const(int*)".

I think that the * must be removed from the second writeln.

[wilzbach]

Yes I agree that this is an oversight. I quickly submitted the PR for you: #251

[astoliar]

Great. Thanks