Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kubernetes orchestrator all namespaces #1059

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2018
Merged

Kubernetes orchestrator all namespaces #1059

merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2018

Conversation

mat007
Copy link
Member

@mat007 mat007 commented May 15, 2018

- What I did

I made --orchestrator=all behave as if also --all-namespaces unless specific namespaces have been queried with --namespace

- How I did it

Opts.AllNamespaces gets set to true if requesting for all orchestrators without specifying a namespace

- Description for the changelog

Setting --orchestrator=all also sets --all-namespaces unless specific --namespace are set.

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

image

@mat007
Copy link
Member Author

mat007 commented May 15, 2018

Split from #1031, only the last commit is new.

@mat007
Copy link
Member Author

mat007 commented May 16, 2018

For reference, here is the current state of the discussion from #1031

@thaJeztah

I still have reservations on the magic relation between --orchestrator=all and --all-namespaces (copying my earlier comment #1031 (comment) here, as it was now hidden);

I'm having trouble conflating these; this may become very confusing:

  • configuration has "orchestrator: all": docker stack ls shows all stacks (both swarm and k8s)
  • I want to view only the k8s stacks, so I add --orchestrator=kubernetes. Now I no longer see all my stacks, only those in the default namespace
  • confused

@chris-crone

The thinking behind this was as follows: When you list stacks across orchestrators your intention is to see all the stacks running on your cluster. When you specify kubernetes as your orchestrator; you are doing something more specific and want similar behaviour to what kubectl gives you.

I can see how this might be confusing for your flow. There will be a NAMESPACE column which should help the user understand what has happened.

@chris-crone

Ah, see you're referring to the case when a user has set orchestrator to all in their config file. I don't think many users will do this as they will only be able to list resources. In order to manipulate resources, they will need to specify an orchestrator.

I don't think many users will do this as they will only be able to list resources.

@thaJeztah

I'm actually not sure: I can definitely see it being useful to just run any docker list or docker ps command, and see everything I have running, then use --filter and/or --orchestrator=x to limit the list to what I'm looking for, or (when deploying / interacting with objects), pass --orchestrator=foo --namespace=bar as part of the steps to deploy.

Which brings me to two things to consider:

  • Add orchestrator and namespace as filter options (--filter orchestrator=swarm) (no high-priority, but for consistency)
  • When interacting with existing objects, only require --orchestrator and/or --namespace if the object refered to is ambiguous, for example, if there's only one stack with a given name, there would be no need to ask for --orchestrator.

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

So

  • connecting orchestrator=all with --all-namespaces means that
    • --orchestrator=all: show all swarm objects and all kubernetes objects, in all namespaces
    • switching to --orchestrator=swarm: shows all swarm objects from the list above
    • switching to --orchestrator=kubernetes: show only kubernetes objects if they're in the "default" namespace (this is the confusing bit)

Thoughts: we could;

  1. special-case the "default" namespace, and consider it (for list-views) equivalent of "no namespace set", in which case we always show "all namespaces", unless user manually passes a namespace --namespace=foo
  2. irregardless of the configured namespace, default to show all namespaces for kubernetes (in list views), unless the user manually passes a namespace --namespace=foo (this one is tricky, because we then ignore the user's preference)
  3. add a configuration option to enable --all-namespaces by default (or, the reverse: allow opt-out and dissable the default --all-namespaces)
  4. add a configuration option to specify namespaces to use: ("namespaces":["all"] or "namespaces":["myteam-stage", "myteam-prod"])
  5. combination of 3. and 4. (to prevent the "all" magic value), in which case "namespaces" defaults to the "default" namespace (as configured by the user), and --all-namespaces either enabled by default or not (whatever we decide on: opt-in/opt-out)

I'm leaning towards 4. (or 3.), as it keeps the user in control;

  • Allows to see all namespaces by default, both for --orchestrator=all and --orchestrator=kubernetes, which may be a use-case if the user manages multiple namespaces (and orchestrators)
  • Allows to only see namespaces that the user is working on (which could be "some" of the ones they have access to), both when viewing kubernetes-only and when viewing "all" orchestrators
  • No magic/unexpected behavior

@silvin-lubecki
Copy link
Contributor

cc @thaJeztah @vdemeester @mat007 I'm opened to any comment on the config file option 😄
I took the third option among those proposed by @thaJeztah

@silvin-lubecki
Copy link
Contributor

silvin-lubecki commented May 25, 2018

Some details on the UX:

# Use kubernetes as default orchestrator
$ cat ~/.docker/config.json
{
  "experimental" : "enabled",
  "orchestrator" : "kubernetes"
}

$ docker version
...
 Orchestrator: kubernetes
...

# Check there is no stack
$ docker stack ls
NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR

# Deploy a stack on the default namespace, optionally defined in the current context in your ~/.kube/config file 
$ docker stack deploy mystack -c docker-compose.yml
...

# Add a new namespace
$ kubectl create namespace mynamespace
namespace "mynamespace" created

# And deploy another stack in it
$ docker stack deploy mystack -c docker-compose.yml --namespace mynamespace
...

# By default, list all stacks in all namespaces
$ docker stack ls
NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR        NAMESPACE
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          default
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          mynamespace

# List can be restricted to one or multiple namespaces
$ docker stack ls --namespace default
NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR        NAMESPACE
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          default

$ docker stack ls --namespace mynamespace --namespace default                                                                        NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR        NAMESPACE
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          default
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          mynamespace

# Deploy a stack on Swarm
$ docker stack deploy mystack -c docker-compose.yml --orchestrator swarm
...

$ docker stack ls --orchestrator swarm
NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR
mystack             5                   Swarm

# Listing on all orchestrators also lists all namespaces
$ docker stack ls --orchestrator all
NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR        NAMESPACE
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          default
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          mynamespace
mystack             5                   Swarm

# Listing all namespaces behavior by default can be disabled in the docker config file
$ cat ~/.docker/config.json
{
  "experimental" : "enabled",
  "orchestrator" : "kubernetes",
  "kubernetes": {
    "allNamespaces" : "disabled"
  }
}

# Now it lists using the default configured namespace
$ docker stack ls
NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR        NAMESPACE
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          default

# List can be extended to one or multiple namespaces
$ docker stack ls --namespace mynamespace
NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR        NAMESPACE
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          mynamespace

$ docker stack ls --namespace mynamespace --namespace default                                                                        NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR        NAMESPACE
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          default
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          mynamespace

# Listing all namespaces is now explicit
$ docker stack ls --all-namespaces
NAME                SERVICES            ORCHESTRATOR        NAMESPACE
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          default
mystack             5                   Kubernetes          mynamespace

Updated

  • Renaming the config field to kubernetes/allNamespaces
  • Removing the docker stack ls listing the first stack, as it doesn't show the default all-namespaces feature

Proxies map[string]ProxyConfig `json:"proxies,omitempty"`
Experimental string `json:"experimental,omitempty"`
Orchestrator string `json:"orchestrator,omitempty"`
StackListAllNamespaces string `json:"stackListAllNamespaces,omitempty"`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we should start to using some nested struct, like

{
  "orchestrator": "kubernetes",
  "stack": {
    "list": {
      "allNamespaces": "disabled",
      "format": "…",
    }
  }
}

cc @thaJeztah

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not, but maybe in a follow up?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will we only use this configuration for stacks, or also for docker service ls ? (wondering about the Stack prefix.

Alternatively, if we want to use a boolean instead of the disabled string, we could use {"singleNamespace": true}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok so what about

{
  "kubernetes": {
    "singleNamespace": true
  }
}

And by the way, singleNamespace makes you think you can only list one namespace, but you still can use multiple --namespace in the docker stack ls command, so it could be a little confusing?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thaJeztah hum good point.
I tend to agree with @silvin-lubecki on the singleNamespace name… but nothing really pop in my head for a correct name.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, good point; I'd say:

  • use "allNamespaces": "disabled"
  • also accept "allNamespaces": "enabled" for those that want to be explicit
  • if no option is set in the configuration, "allNamespaces": "enabled" is the default

SGTY?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

Looks like there's a linting failure;

cli/config/configfile/file.go:60:6:warning: exported type KubernetesConfig should have comment or be unexported (golint)
Exited with code 1 

@silvin-lubecki
Copy link
Contributor

Indeed 😔

mat007 and others added 2 commits May 28, 2018 10:43
…or is all or Kubernetes

* Add "kubernetes" struct in config file with "allNamespaces" option, to opt-out this behavior when set as "disabled"

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Champlon <[email protected]>
@silvin-lubecki
Copy link
Contributor

PTAL 😄

Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🐯

Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

As a follow-up we need to update the CLI configuration documentation https://github.com/docker/cli/blob/master/docs/reference/commandline/cli.md#configuration-files

Unfortunately, that one is quite messy, and in need of a proper rewrite (with actual examples 😞)

@vdemeester vdemeester merged commit 8205323 into docker:master May 28, 2018
@GordonTheTurtle GordonTheTurtle added this to the 18.06.0 milestone May 28, 2018
return getStacksWithAllNamespaces(kubeCli, opts)
}
return getStacksWithNamespaces(kubeCli, opts, removeDuplicates(opts.Namespaces))
}

func isAllNamespacesDisabled(kubeCliConfig *configfile.KubernetesConfig) bool {
return kubeCliConfig == nil || kubeCliConfig != nil && kubeCliConfig.AllNamespaces != "disabled"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, one thing: do we want a strict check to only accept "disabled", "enabled" or nil ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, @silvin-lubecki will follow up 👼

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure I will!

@silvin-lubecki
Copy link
Contributor

Is this the only documentation we have about the CLI configuration? Nothing else on docs.docker.com?

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

We may need some more in general (about working with multiple orchestrators); not sure if "orchestrator" was already documented in the configuration; also some flags/options are currently experimental, so we'll have to do a "sweep" after they leave experimental, so see if everything is there.

Would be good to have a tracking issue in which we can add things that we think about (could be a checkbox-list style)

@silvin-lubecki
Copy link
Contributor

Not yet in the documentation as it was behind the experimental feature flag.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants