Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new Hosted build pools #58484

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2021
Merged

Conversation

ulisesh
Copy link
Contributor

@ulisesh ulisesh commented Sep 1, 2021

We are transitioning all servicing builds to a new set of build pools

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 1, 2021

Tagging subscribers to this area: @Anipik, @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

We are transitioning all servicing builds to a new set of build pools

Author: ulisesh
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-libraries

Milestone: -

@ulisesh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ulisesh commented Sep 1, 2021

Same as #57785

@@ -55,11 +55,11 @@ jobs:
testDisplayName: ${{ parameters.runtimeFlavor }}_interpreter_${{ parameters.liveRuntimeBuildConfig }}

# To run the tests we just send to helix and wait, use ubuntu hosted pools for faster providing and to not back up our build pools
${{ if startsWith(parameters.pool.queue, 'BuildPool.Ubuntu') }}:
${{ if startsWith(parameters.pool.queue, 'Build.Ubuntu') }}:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I agree with this sentiment. I favor as many machines as can be of the 200 parallelism limit be macOS since ostensibly 1ES can handle these but not MacOS

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change is not correct anyway, as the new pool property is demands and it doesn't start with Build.Ubuntu.

pool.queue no longer exists after this change. So we can safely delete this as now are a no-op.

Copy link
Member

@MattGal MattGal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks correct, not sure I want the wait on helix jobs to use hosted but don't feel strongly either.

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer merged commit 0e71ebc into dotnet:release/6.0 Sep 2, 2021
@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

cc @danmoseley (tell-mode)

@ulisesh ulisesh deleted the 1ESPools60 branch September 2, 2021 18:30
@ulisesh ulisesh mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2021
radical added a commit to radical/runtime that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2021
radical added a commit to radical/runtime that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2021
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 3, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants