Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added logic for undefined tenant in header and add employe in view url page #1385

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

aaradhya-egov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@aaradhya-egov aaradhya-egov requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2024 09:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the rendering logic of the Header component in the Login page and updates to the URL structure in the ViewUrl component. The Header now conditionally renders based on the presence of a code property in the stateInfo object, while the ViewUrl function's URL format has been updated to include /employee. Unused code has also been removed to streamline the implementation.

Changes

File Change Summary
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/components/Header.js
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/Login/login.js
Updated conditional rendering logic for the Header component based on stateInfo?.code.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/ViewUrl/index.js Modified URL structure in the ViewUrl function to append /employee, and removed unused FieldV1 component.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 In the code where rabbits hop,
A Header now has a new stop.
With stateInfo guiding the way,
Tenant info brightens the day!
URLs now lead to employee land,
A cleaner path, all perfectly planned! 🌟


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 815f9fa and 1d773ec.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/components/Header.js (1 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/Login/login.js (1 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/ViewUrl/index.js (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/components/Header.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/ViewUrl/index.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/Login/login.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

Additional comments not posted (3)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/components/Header.js (1)

15-15: LGTM!

The change enhances the robustness of the component by preventing the rendering of potentially undefined or empty tenant information. The use of the optional chaining operator ?. is a good practice to safely access the code property of the stateInfo object and prevent errors when the object is undefined. The change aligns with the PR objective of adding logic for undefined tenant in the header.

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/ViewUrl/index.js (1)

47-47: LGTM!

The change to the URL format is accurate and consistent with the intended shift to the employee context.

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/Login/login.js (1)

193-193: Verify the impact of conditional rendering on the Header component's behavior and user experience.

The change looks good. It introduces a conditional rendering mechanism for the Header component based on the presence of stateInfo?.code.

To ensure the change does not introduce any unintended consequences, please verify the following:

  1. Test the rendering of the Header component with different values of stateInfo?.code to confirm that it behaves as expected in all scenarios.
  2. Assess the impact of the change on the user experience, considering the context in which the Login component is used. Ensure that the conditional rendering does not adversely affect the functionality or visibility of the Header component.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov merged commit 6904f6e into develop Sep 12, 2024
2 checks passed
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov deleted the aardhya-sandbox branch September 12, 2024 10:03
This was referenced Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants