CSS Issue fix, locaisation/mdms cache issue fix #1418
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes encompass various updates across multiple files, primarily focusing on CSS styling enhancements for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (4)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/sandbox.scss (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/libraries/src/services/elements/Localization/service.js (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/libraries/src/services/elements/MDMS.js (6 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/sandbox/src/pages/employee/applicationMgmt/SetupMaster.js (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/libraries/src/services/elements/Localization/service.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/libraries/src/services/elements/MDMS.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/sandbox/src/pages/employee/applicationMgmt/SetupMaster.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: check
Biome
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/libraries/src/services/elements/MDMS.js
[error] 1037-1037: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 1047-1047: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
Additional comments not posted (3)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/libraries/src/services/elements/Localization/service.js (1)
50-52: Please provide context and consider potential implications.The addition of the "digit-tenants" module for multi-root tenants lacks clear documentation. Could you please:
- Add a comment explaining the purpose and implications of this change?
- Confirm if this change aligns with the PR objectives (CSS Issue fix, localisation/mdms cache issue fix)?
- Ensure comprehensive testing to verify that this change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior in the localization process, especially for different tenant configurations.
To help verify the impact and usage of this change, please run the following script:
This will help us understand the broader context and ensure consistent implementation across the codebase.
Verification successful
Verification Successful: The addition of "digit-tenants" is consistent with its existing usage in the codebase. No unexpected behavior was identified from the script results.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of getMultiRootTenant() and references to "digit-tenants" echo "Searching for getMultiRootTenant() usage:" rg --type js "getMultiRootTenant\(\)" echo "\nSearching for 'digit-tenants' references:" rg --type js "digit-tenants"Length of output: 7221
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/sandbox.scss (1)
438-456: Overall assessment: Styles are consistent but could be optimized.The changes to the
.homeWrapperclass introduce styles for.digit-card-componentthat are consistent with the existing styles for.digit-employee-card. This consistency is good for maintaining a uniform look across components.However, there are opportunities to improve the CSS:
- Avoid using
!importantflags by refactoring to use more specific selectors or reorganizing the CSS structure.- Consider using consistent and rounded values for font sizes (e.g., 2rem instead of 1.87rem).
- If these styles are meant to be shared between
.digit-card-componentand.digit-employee-card, consider creating a shared class or using a mixin to reduce code duplication.These optimizations would improve the maintainability and flexibility of the stylesheet.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/sandbox/src/pages/employee/applicationMgmt/SetupMaster.js (1)
69-71: Good addition, but consider these improvementsThe added check for empty
MdmsResis a good practice to prevent processing empty data. However, there are a few points to consider:
- Ensure that Lodash is properly imported if you're using
_.isEmpty().- The indentation of the new code block is inconsistent. Consider aligning it with the rest of the function.
- Returning
falsefor empty data might affect the component's behavior. Ensure this is the intended outcome.Consider applying these changes:
select: (data) => { - if (_.isEmpty(data?.MdmsRes)) { - return false - } + if (_.isEmpty(data?.MdmsRes)) { + return false; + } const resp = data?.MdmsRes; const checkMasterDataCompleteness = Object.values(resp).every((category) => Object.values(category).every((items) => items.every((item) => parseInt(item.count) > 0)) );Also, verify that Lodash is imported at the top of the file:
import _ from 'lodash';To ensure Lodash is properly imported, run this script:
| .homeWrapper{ | ||
| .digit-card-component{ | ||
| .digit-card-header{ | ||
| color: #0b4b66 !important; | ||
| font-size: 1.87rem !important; | ||
| text-align: center; | ||
| font-weight: 700; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider refactoring to avoid !important and use consistent font sizes.
The new styles for .digit-card-component within .homeWrapper are similar to the existing styles for .digit-employee-card. However, there are a few points to consider:
-
The use of
!importantflags might indicate specificity issues. Consider refactoring the CSS to avoid using!importantby increasing the specificity of the selectors. -
The font size of 1.87rem is unusual. For better maintainability and consistency, consider using a rounded value like 1.9rem or 2rem.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
.homeWrapper {
.digit-card-component {
.digit-card-header {
color: #0b4b66;
font-size: 2rem;
text-align: center;
font-weight: 700;
}
}
}This change removes the !important flags and rounds the font size to 2rem for better consistency.
| .homeWrapper{ | ||
| .digit-card-component{ | ||
| .digit-card-text{ | ||
| font-size: 1rem !important; | ||
| font-weight: 700; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider refactoring to avoid !important and improve selector specificity.
The new styles for .digit-card-text within .digit-card-component in .homeWrapper are consistent with the existing styles for .digit-employee-card. However, there's an opportunity for improvement:
- The use of
!importantflag on font-size might indicate specificity issues. Consider refactoring the CSS to avoid using!importantby increasing the specificity of the selectors.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
.homeWrapper {
.digit-card-component {
.digit-card-text {
font-size: 1rem;
font-weight: 700;
}
}
}This change removes the !important flag. If you still encounter specificity issues, consider using more specific selectors or reorganizing your CSS structure to avoid the need for !important.
No description provided.