Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert tests to jest in vis_type_timeseries/server folder #54896

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 16, 2020

Conversation

sulemanof
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This is a part of #54339.

Checklist

Use strikethroughs to remove checklist items you don't feel are applicable to this PR.

For maintainers

@sulemanof sulemanof added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v7.7.0 v8.0.0 labels Jan 15, 2020
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

Copy link
Contributor

@flash1293 flash1293 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! 👍

@sulemanof sulemanof merged commit b06977f into elastic:master Jan 16, 2020
@sulemanof sulemanof deleted the tests/vis_type_timeseries/server branch January 16, 2020 12:38
sulemanof added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2020
…55032)

* Move vis_data/series tests to jest

* Move tests in request_processors/series to jest

* Move tests in vis_data to jest

* Convert other tests to jest

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>
jkelastic pushed a commit to jkelastic/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2020
…4896)

* Move vis_data/series tests to jest

* Move tests in request_processors/series to jest

* Move tests in vis_data to jest

* Convert other tests to jest
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backported release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v7.7.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants