Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-1271: Change an to a in ERC 1271, as it precedes signed #6951

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2023

Conversation

flanagansteve
Copy link
Contributor

@flanagansteve flanagansteve commented Apr 28, 2023

Change an to a in ERC 1271, as it precedes signed. I believe this was just a typo.

I also noticed the clause:

considering that an authorized signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract

And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.

Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo.

I also noticed the clause:

> considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract

And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-final This EIP is Final t-erc labels Apr 28, 2023
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Apr 28, 2023

✅ All reviewers have approved.

@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Change an to a in ERC 1271, as it precedes signed Update EIP-1271: Change an to a in ERC 1271, as it precedes signed Apr 28, 2023
@eth-bot eth-bot added the e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus label Apr 28, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

The commit 513ad56 (as a parent of 76310b7) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Apr 28, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Pandapip1 Pandapip1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is clearly a typo.

@flanagansteve
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is clearly a typo.

@Pandapip1 it looks like eth-bot is blocking merging. Do you want me to make the corrections to other content in the failing CI checks (EIP Walidator and Markdown Linter), or are you able to ignore those and facilitate merge?

I figured it made sense to restrict this PR to just fixing the typo, but if you want me to make the changes recommended by those tools i can do so too

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member

Pandapip1 commented May 1, 2023

The reason @eth-bot is blocking merging is because it requires more than one reviewer to make changes to final EIPs. Do not change anything else, or it will clear my approval.

@Pandapip1 Pandapip1 requested a review from SamWilsn May 3, 2023 12:00
@eth-bot eth-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) May 4, 2023 23:26
Copy link
Collaborator

@eth-bot eth-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@SamWilsn SamWilsn disabled auto-merge May 4, 2023 23:29
@SamWilsn SamWilsn merged commit 0ce65ae into ethereum:master May 4, 2023
axelcabee pushed a commit to axelcabee/EIPs that referenced this pull request May 6, 2023
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo.

I also noticed the clause:

> considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract

And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
axelcabee pushed a commit to axelcabee/EIPs that referenced this pull request May 6, 2023
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo.

I also noticed the clause:

> considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract

And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
alcedo pushed a commit to StraitsX/EIPs that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2023
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo.

I also noticed the clause:

> considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract

And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
RaphaelHardFork pushed a commit to RaphaelHardFork/EIPs that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo.

I also noticed the clause:

> considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract

And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
GAEAlimited pushed a commit to GAEAlimited/EIPs that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo.

I also noticed the clause:

> considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract

And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-update Modifies an existing proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus s-final This EIP is Final t-erc w-ci Waiting on CI to pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants