Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade TLS Version in Mock Server to 1.2 #3039

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 30, 2021
Merged

Upgrade TLS Version in Mock Server to 1.2 #3039

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 30, 2021

Conversation

caramelomartins
Copy link
Contributor

@caramelomartins caramelomartins commented Apr 24, 2021

Description

As per #3038, this PR aims to upgrade the TLS version of KubernetesMockServer to 1.2, given that Oracle deprecated 1.0 and 1.1 in some JDK versions. I ended up upgrading it in all mocks servers so that it remains consistent throughout the codebase.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change
  • Chore (non-breaking change which doesn't affect codebase;
    test, version modification, documentation, etc.)

Checklist

  • Code contributed by me aligns with current project license: Apache 2.0
  • I Added CHANGELOG entry regarding this change
  • I have implemented unit tests to cover my changes
  • I have added/updated the javadocs and other documentation accordingly
  • No new bugs, code smells, etc. in SonarCloud report
  • I tested my code in Kubernetes
  • I tested my code in OpenShift

@centos-ci
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@caramelomartins caramelomartins marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2021 18:59
@caramelomartins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any idea what the test failure in Sonar is all about? 🤔

@rohanKanojia
Copy link
Member

Sorry, we need to fix this flaky test #3036 . I've restarted workflow

@caramelomartins
Copy link
Contributor Author

No worries. Not sure how I can improve the coverage on the code I've changed though. Any ideas?

@rohanKanojia
Copy link
Member

I couldn't find a test for any of these classes. I'm not sure if we should add tests in the scope of this PR or not.

@caramelomartins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rohanKanojia I'm not sure I'm qualified (or have the knowledge) to write tests for all of the classes, to be honest...

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 27, 2021

@rohanKanojia
Copy link
Member

No problem, your change is not so big. If required, maintainers can add tests as well.

Copy link
Member

@manusa manusa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thx!

@manusa manusa merged commit b4f36db into fabric8io:master Apr 30, 2021
grgrzybek added a commit to jboss-fuse/kubernetes-client that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2021
grgrzybek added a commit to jboss-fuse/kubernetes-client that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants